Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Above The Law Essay Example For Students

Above The Law Essay The flashing lights of the police cars are blinding to you in your inebriated state. Through your drunken haze, the events leading up to now start to unfold. You were pulling ninety miles an hour in your SUV, when you collided with the bus full of blind orphans. The resulting crash sent the bus careening off the overpass, and onto a passing group of nuns and the governor, killing all of them instantly. The total body count is so far unknown. If you were an average person, you could expect the electric chair without question. Of course, youre far from average. Youre a former Olympic champion who stars in the number one rated show in America, and whose movie has won multiple Academy Awards. You are in fact, a celebrity. Youll be free before you have time to get comfortable in a holding cell. You wont even have to serve any real prison time. At most, youll probably have to serve a few hours of community service. Although this moment seems preposterous, as well as obviously impossible, it essentially occurs all the time to a lesser degree. Athletes and other celebrities are almost always assured that they will usually get a slight fine or a few hours of community service at the most, and still get to wear any time served as a badge of honor. Because of their immense wealth, and more importantly, their huge public standing, they tend to receive an unfair advantage in the courts, while someone who performs the same act is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Because most celebrities possess exorbitant amounts of cash, they can purchase the best legal staff that money can buy. These attorneys are an almost assured win for the defense, since they can find all the potential legal loopholes necessary for an acquittal. By purchasing legendary attorneys, they can come up with excellent testimony on their behalf, essentially allowing them to beat the system regardless of their crime. As has proven in past cases, these attorneys can pretty much beat any charge leveled against their client. An average person would regrettably have to either settle with a public defender, or a cheaper attorney, neither of which can give an edge for the defendant. A key example of this was when former heavyweight boxer Riddock Bowe kidnapped his wife and children a few years ago. All the evidence was there to convict him and put him away for a long time, but because he had Johnnie Cochran as an attorney, it was argued that he was punch drunk, thereby giving him probation. The limited capacities excuse is a clear argument for celebrities, along with the stupidity excuse, as was shown in the Pedro Guerrero case last year. Mr. Guerrero was acquitted of drug charges after it was proven that he was too stupid to have done it. Anyone non-famous attempting either of these tricks would be laughed all the way to prison, since kidnapping is a federal offense, and the government prosecutes to the fullest possible extent. Another leading to celebrity superiority is that they are held on such a high pedestal, that the public refuses to believe that whatever allegations leveled are absurd. This has happened for years, with growing intensity. The first man to get away with this was the late Ty Cobb. Cobbs on the field antics were infamous in the world of baseball, but his off the field actions were even worse. He was once fined $150 for beating a black elevator operator for being insolent. He was once suspended for one game after jumping into the stands and beating a heckler to the point where his own mother wouldnt recognize him; so badly in fact, that the man lost three fingers. Another time he nearly slashed off a mans face after an attempted hold-up. No charges were ever leveled. Since Ty Cobb was at the time the biggest name in baseball, he was allowed to walk away with only minor fines. The same thing still occurs now. .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 , .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .postImageUrl , .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 , .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421:hover , .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421:visited , .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421:active { border:0!important; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421:active , .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421 .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u50c08cdfa3ca68b640f4eaf56a997421:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: THE TREATY OF WAITANGI EssayA celebrity tends to get preferential treatment from the police, the media, and the public, since these people are role models and heroes. A more modern example of this is Daryl Strawberry. Daryl Strawberry was projected to be a Hall of Fame baseball player since his rookie year. Unfortunately, he had a severe cocaine problem. After it nearly cost him his baseball career, he appeared to have straightened out and gone sober. Unfortunately, last spring he was suspended for parole violations after testing positive for cocaine. After being placed in rehab, he has escaped every time he has a chance. When found, he also repeatedly tests positive for cocaine. And what do his former employers say? Strawberry still has a job as soon as he comes off of suspension. If a normal person were to ever try any of Cobbs antics, or even Strawberrys, they would obviously still be serving time. Celebrities are also fortunate to make plea bargains from felonies down to country club rehab time. Essentially, because of their high standing, it is believed that the celebrity in trouble can easily rectify whatever problem they have through a few weeks of unsupervised rehabilitation, followed by an immediate return to wherever the problem occurred. Whereas a normal person could expect to have a long prison stay, a famous person can expect to get multiple chances to clean up their act. Daryl Strawberry, Robert Downey, and Kelsey Grammer have all consistently beaten multiple drug, alcohol, and probation violations without any stiff penalties. All are still gainfully employed, and are still granted the right to work at their jobs while serving time. Of course, they almost always break the rules of their release within hours, but its okay since theyre famous. When you are famous, no matter what you do, it is okay as long as you remain famous. This is a perfect sign of a disjointed culture in which role models are allowed to continue their lives with no retribution, while a common man would be blacklisted from any employment after release. It should be made to be that the special treatment is gone, making those with true problems have to be confined until it can proven that whatever problem they have is gone. No one has a job that important that they cant be replaced, and this includes the famous. In a day and age in which those who are famous are for all extensive purposes above the law, it makes one wonder when society will say enough. As is the current trend, although most celebrities get off, one will essentially be justly prosecuted. The scales should be balanced out again by removing any potential legal loopholes as a start. Justice should truly be blind, not dumb or easily swayed. It is hopeful that one day the scales of justice will finally be equal, and that the rich and famous will not be the only ones to receive leniency in the courts.

Monday, December 2, 2019

The Watergate Complex Is A Series Of Modern Buildings With Essays

"The Watergate Complex is a series of modern buildings with balconies that looks like filed down Shark's Teeth" (Gold, 1). Located on the Potomac River in Washington, D.C. it contains many hotel rooms and offices. What happened in the complex on June 17, 1972 early in the morning became a very historical event for our nation that no one will ever forget. The "Watergate Scandal" and constitutional crisis that began on June 17, 1972 with the arrest of five burglars who broke into the Democratic National Committee (DMC) headquarters at the Watergate office building in Washington D.C. It ended with the registration of President Richard M. Nixon on August 9, 1974. (Watergate) At approximately 2:30 in the morning of June 17, 1972 five men were arrested at the Watergate Complex. The police seized a walkie talkie, 40 rolls of unexposed film, two 35 millimeter cameras, lock picks, pensized teargas guns, and bugging devices. (Gold, 75) These five men and two co-plotters were indicated in September 1972 on charges of burglary, conspiracy and wire tapping. Four months later they were convicted and sentenced to prison terms by District Court Judge John J. Sercia was convinced that relevant details had not been unveiled during the trial and offered leniency in exchanged for further information. As it became increasingly evident that the Watergate burglars were tied closely to the Central Intelligence Agency and the Committee to re-elect the president. (Watergate) Four of these men, that were arrested on the morning of June 17, 1972, came from Miami, Florida. They were Bernard L. Barker, Frank A. Sturgis, Virgillio R. Gonzalez, and Eugenio R. Martinez. The other man was from Rockville, Maryland named James W. McCord, Jr. The two co-plotters were G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt. (Watergate) The senate established and investigative committee headed by Senate Sam Ervin, Jr., to look into the growing scandal. As they were investigating, they related that the famous break-in was far more involved than what everyone had expected. (Watergate) The White Houses involvement of that morning first became evident when James McCord wrote a letter to Judge Sirca. In this letter McCord explained that he wanted to disclose the details of Watergate. He made it apparent that he would not speak to a Justice department official of an FBI agent. Although his letter did unveil details, it made server chargers. McCord justified that "Political pressure" (Westerfled 36) had generated many defendants to plead guilty and remain silent. He also claimed that there had been whiteness at the trail who had committed perjury in order to protect the people who headed the brake-in. McCord declared that he, his family, and his friend may be in danger if he spoke out. (Westerfled 36-37) The Senate Watergate Committee saw their chance to unravel the mystery of this scandal. The offered James McCord a chance to speak publicly. In his first meeting with representatives of this committee he named two more people that he claimed were involved in the burglary and cover-up. Theses two men were John Dean and Jeb Margruder. Margruder was the second-in-charge of the CRP and Dean was a White House aid. After hearing these substantial accusations the Senate Watergate Committee promptly subpoenaed John Dean and Jeb Margruder. (Westerfled 37-38). After the next session with James McCord he took the whiteness stand and explained how Liddy had promised him an executive pardon if he would plead guilty. This began to question the a White House involvement since only the president could present such a pardon. (Westerfled, 40) Jeb Margruder was the next witness to testify. He admitted his own perjury to the Grand Jury and verified what McCord had said. While on the stand he also revealed another name to add to the list of those involved, John Mitchell. (Gold, 246-247) The next witness scheduled to appear was John Dean. In Dean's testimony he exposed that the Watergate burglary had been only a part of a greater abuse of power. He said that for four years the White House had used the powers of the presidency to attack political enemies. They spied on and harassed anyone who did not agree with Nixon's policies. If a reporter wrote stories criticizing the White House they would be singled out for tax investigations. The White House also kept an "Enemies List" (Westerfled 43) of people that the presidents men wanted revenge on. After being fired, dean kept official documents that supported his statements. (Westerfled 43-44; Gold 309-330) John Dean said, is his opening statements, that he had discussed the cover-up with president Nixon in several meetings. At the first meeting, in September 1972, he told

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Admission Essay on Nursing

Admission Essay on Nursing Admission Essay on Nursing My philosophy with regards to nursing is closely related to my deep desire to assist people. I want to be a nurse because of many reasons, one being that I love helping people, caring for people. and generally being there for people in terms of need. My desire for nursing became stronger some years ago when I did volunteer work in a hospital. The little work I did there ignited my passion for nursing since I felt that it is only through nursing that I will be able to satisfy the passion that I have for serving and helping people. Also, I want to do nursing because I believe that besides prescribed medicine, good care is also a cure to many of the ailments that plague patients. With a little love and care, a patient can feel more relaxed and, therefore, be better positioned to heal. Consequently, I believe that once I become a nurse, I will make a great difference in the lives of many people by helping them to recover from their various ailments. One of the philosophies that I deeply hold dear is my belief that one’s state of mind affects the general health status of that individual. An individual can only be gravely ill if he believes in his mind that he is gravely ill. With the training that I hope to receive in nursing school, I expect to be able to understand patients and what they are going through. In doing so, I can do what is needed to help them feel better and, therefore, recover faster from their various ailments. I also believe that true care is that which reinforces the relationship between the nurse and the patient. Additionally, in order to improve the recovery rate of a patient, it is important to provide that patient with the right kind of atmosphere or environment. This means setting up the recovery room in such a way that it helps the patient to sense the soothing and healing effects just from the ambience of his environment. Before nurses can be able to provide this kind of care, they should first un derstand themselves so they can better treat patients. For me, nursing is more of a calling that a profession I also have a unique perception of health. Being healthy is the lack of disease in the body of a human being. However, I also believe that the health of an individual entails living harmoniously and having balance in the mind, soul, and body. The role of nursing is not only limited to helping patients and assisting doctors, but it mostly entails taking care of all those under ones care. Admission essay writing tips: For this essay, one is expected to write what one believes about nursing, which could also be one’s philosophy with regards to nursing. Basically, this essay is written to show the reader the reason why selecting the applicant for the nursing program is a good idea. To convince the reader that admitting the applicant to the program is a good idea, the applicant needs to demonstrate that he or she is not just interested in the nursing program but is actually passionate about the nursing career. This essay will also entail discussing the role of a nurse. At you can get a custom admission essay on Nursing topics written by top-rated writers. All you need is to place your order now!

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Ensayo Sobre Etica Essays

Ensayo Sobre Etica Essays Ensayo Sobre Etica Essay Ensayo Sobre Etica Essay Filosofia Etica Tirsa Perez Rodriguez Management MGT/521 1ro de mayo de 2010 Profesor: Harold Rivera Etica En el siguiente ensayo se presentan los valores y aspectos eticos de la estudiante luego de haber realizado el avaluo Ethics Awareness inventory(University of Phoenix, 2004). Luego considerara los valores de Kudler Fine Foods como empresa y se comparara con los mismos, explicando como los aspectos de su perfil etico afectarian su desempeno, en caso de ser gerente en dicha organizacion. La etica es un conjunto reglas o principios que guian la buena conducta (N.D.). De acuerdo a la profesion las personas deben aprender como realmente debe ser su conducta en su area de trabajo. El avaluo Ethics Awareness Inventory es una prueba para orientar a las personas que lo toman, sobre su filosofia etica; analizandolas en varias categorias como: caracter, equidad y resultados. Al realizar el avaluo la estudiante no se sintio comoda; no fue de su agrado tener que seleccionar, en muchas de las aseveraciones, las dos opciones requeridas (menos o mas) de cada una; entiende que la etica se compone de una integracion de todos los criterios y considera que se puede tener un balance y no estar exactamente alineado con un area especifica. Por esa razon realizo el assesment en dos ocasiones con el interes de conocer que resultados se acercarian mas a la realidad; tomando en cuenta que el avaluo  ¦es una descripcion general y puede que no se ajuste exactamente a ti (University of Phoenix, 2006). En la primera ejecucion de la prueba, la estudiante obtuvo una puntuacion que la describio con un perfil mas alineado con los resultados. Se explica que desde esa perspectiva, la persona se basa en los consecuencias de sus actos y en promover lo mejor para la mayoria. Al realizar la prueba, nuevamente, obtuvo un perfil etico mas alineado con su caracter y menos con equidad. Este perfil la describe como una persona que le da mas importancia a su caracter, considerando la integridad y rectitud muy importantes; incluye cualidades como honestidad y sabiduria (University of Phoenix, 2006). Luego de haber analizado ambos resultados, la estudiante entiende que en su trabajo presenta un balance de los dos. Es muy recta en su area de trabajo y le gusta ir a la par con las reglas establecidas y la etica, a la vez que puede presentar flexibilidad al tratarse del bien comun. Al analizar la organizacion Kudler Fine Foods, la estudiante puede apreciar que Kathy, la presidenta, contribuye al bien comun cuando dona sus alimentos menos frescos a personas que lo necesitan ( Apollo Group, Inc., 2003). Tambien podemos apreciar sus valores considerando su honestidad, al reconocer que el salario de sus empleados no es el mejor y los recompensa con comida. Kathy muestra su integridad y rectitud al estar presente en cada una de sus tiendas la mayoria del tiempo y su sabiduria al estar al dia con lo que esta vigente en el mercado y nuevas estrategias.( Apollo Group, Inc., 2003). De la estudiante ser la gerente en kudler Fine Foods, su valor de rectitud podria ayudar la organizacion en mantener sus valores y promover la honestidad entre los empleados La gente puede ser termometros o termostatos. Van a reflejar el clima alrededor de ellos, o lo estableceran. Los lideres desarrollan valores y principios para aplicarlos a su vida y trazan el camino para otros (Elmore, 2008, pag.13). La inclinacion de la estudiante de lo que se debe ser y su integridad ante todo, mejoraria la situacion en el area de Recursos Humanos y las tareas que realiza Kathy serian distribuidas a las personas que se supone que las realicen; el enfoque en resultados de la misma manera seria efectivo pues de acuerdo a como los empleados realicen las funciones les continuaria dando confianza y valor por su trabajo realizado Estar facultado significa que uno tiene libertad para actuar; tambien significa que uno es responsable por los resultados(Blanchard, Carlos Randolph, 2005). La inteligencia ayudaria a concienzar sobre la necesidad de delegar en las demas personas como estrategia para poder crecer y expandirse como negocio, abriendo nuevas tiendas en diferentes lugares estrategicos. La estudiante, luego de analizar la filosofia etica que mejor la describe en su desempeno en el area de trabajo y como la aplicaria a la organizacion Kudler Fine Foods, entiende que algunas de las caracteristicas no ayudarian en su funcion como gerente. Pudo aprender que no solo puede enfocarse en como todo debe funcionar de acuerdo a su vision de valores, pues no todas las personas se rigen por los mismos valores; entiende que el caracter de un lider puede llevar una organizacion al exito o a la derrotaThe iceberg represents your leadership. The 10% above the water is your skill. The 90% bellow the water is your character. Itâ„ ¢s whatâ„ ¢s below the surface that sinks the ship(Elmore, 2008). Comprendio que es necesario ser flexible, en cuanto a rectitud, pues se debe atender la situacion por su particularidad; no en todo lo que ocurre se debe enfrentar con la misma estrategia. El realizar el avaluo y escribir este ensayo reflexivo sirvio de crecimiento para la estudiante, pues aunque entiende que presenta un balance en su filosofia etica, tambien se hizo consciente de que es muy estricta con las reglas en su area laboral y esto puede perjudicar el desempeno del empleado y como se da la empatia con el mismo. Entiende que es necesario considerar diferentes estrategias que permita que la organizacion realice sus metas; comprendio tambien la importancia del caracter al hablar sobre etica y como esta cualidad ayuda a fomentar ese tipo de comportamiento pues un lider no construye su caracter sin cruzar el puente de la disciplina. La disciplina personal es como un puente que cruza desde donde estas hacia lo que quisieras ser. Te lleva a donde quieres estar(Elmore, 2008). Un buen lider debe actuar con disciplina y demostrar su caracter para influenciar a sus empleados a ser eficientes en su trabajo y lograr asi el comportamiento etico y el exito de la organizac ion la influencia es la esencia del liderazgo, y los lideres poderosos pueden tener un impacto substancial en las vidas de sus seguidores y el destino de una organizacion( Yukl, 2006). Referencias Blanchard K., Carlos J. Randolph A. (2005). Empowerment. Grupo Editorial Norma. Colombia Elmore T. (2008). Habitudes: Images that Form Laedership Habits Attitudes. N.D. Ethics. Recuperado de X Refer XML Database. University of Phoenix(2003). Kudler Fine Foods[ Plan Estrategico]. Extraido de: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/ic/classroom.aspx Yukl G.(2006). Leadership in Organizations(6ta ed.) Extraido de University of Phoenix ebook Collection Database. MGT/521. Extraido el 1ro de mayo de 2010.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Fashion - Ralph Lauren Annotated Bibliography Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Fashion - Ralph Lauren - Annotated Bibliography Example The essay "Fashion - Ralph Lauren" analyzes the book about fashion and Ralph Lauren. To sum up the book, it is quite an enjoyable experience to read this book as it builds up the image of Ralph Lauren in the minds of the readers. The book relates to my research area in that it includes all information about the real life of Ralph Lauren that I can use as supplementary information for my research. In this book, the author has presented Ralph Lauren as a man who changed the perception of people about fashion. The author has used a wide range of primary and secondary references to support the information included in the book. As far as the scope of the book is concerned, the book covers Ralph Lauren in relation to the concept of style and fashion more than his personal life. The book is very useful for my research topic as it includes information about the style and visionary outlook of Lauren that I would really like to include in my paper. There is hardly any major limitation I have f ound for this book except that it includes a little less information about his personal life. To sum up the book, it includes a bundle of information about the vision of Ralph Lauren and the way he has kept the link between the past and the present intact. The book relates to my research area in that it includes information about a great fashion designer whose designs and ideas reflect the overall culture of the United States. The authors tried to identify the dimensions of evaluative criteria during the purchase of branded clothes.

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Analysis of Valet Ticket Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Analysis of Valet Ticket - Assignment Example There is a variety of laws which regulates valet ticket across U.S. These laws have been put in place so as to safeguard consumers from the damage of cars and personal belongings inside the car. Valet parking is mostly common in California particularly in Southern California and Los Angeles (Chrest, 2001). Planet Hollywood hotel& casino based in Las Vegas has a valet parking service. The state must license each valet organization in California. In order for the hotel to qualify for the license, the hotel must have an insurance policy to protect the vehicles while in their custody. The insurance cover will protect the persons and vehicles up to a specific amount of a deductible. Bailment theory has been defined as the delivery of something in respect of trust for a special object. If a car is damaged or a person is injured while is in the hotel, the initial question is whether a valet ticket has been offered. When a car containing personal belongings is left in a valet parking, courts usually engage in two analysis to determine liability. One concerns the vehicle and the other concerns the contents in the vehicle. When keys are left with the valet operator, there is bailment. However, if there is damage to a vehicle, and the keys had not been surrendered to the valet there is no

Sunday, November 17, 2019

Victor Frankenstein Essay Example for Free

Victor Frankenstein Essay He uses imagery to give examples for how he felt, like when he says I crept from my kennel as though he was a disgraced dog, and treated like an animal. At this point, the reader may have changed their views about the creation, but Frankenstein certainly hasnt. He knows about how well spoken the monster is and thinks of it as a trick, to lure people into keeping him company. He says to Robert Walton that the creature is eloquent and persuasive, and once his words had a power over my heart; but trust him not. Frankenstein still believes the creature is to blame. When Walton sees the creature for the first time, he believes what Frankenstein told him on his deathbed. He says I beheld a vision so horrible as his face, of such loathsome yet appalling hideousness. It shows the reader how the monsters appearance somehow overshadows the beauty of its speech. Finally, Shelley uses some archaic language to show the historical context of the book. She uses the word deamon when Frankenstein refers to the monster and this spelling of the word is no longer used. Shelley chose this word to describe the creature because it has connotations of the devil and evil ways. This links in with Shelleys society and religion because everyone was religious and using the word deamon would show just how much hate Frankenstein had for his monster. Frankenstein, by using this particular word for the creature, shows how he feels that he is the innocent one. When the monster speaks, his language is very fluent, smooth and flowing which links in well with the Romantic Movement, which was very much around at the time, the book was written. The structure of the book is very interesting as it starts at the end, then goes back in time to explain the story. This gives the reader a chance to hear Frankensteins side of the story as he tells it to Robert Walton. The first part of the book is written as epistolary. This means it is written as a form of letters put together into a story. First, there are letters from Robert Walton to his sister Margaret. These letters make it clear that he has an obsession, much like Frankensteins, about reaching the North Pole. He then mentions that he has met a stranger, and goes on to inform Margaret of Frankensteins story. We hear Frankensteins story, right up to where he reaches Waltons ship, and then it continues in the form of epistolary. The structure is very interesting, because Walton writes about his own story to Margaret and his story includes Frankensteins story which also includes the creatures story. So Walton who is writing to his sister (and the audience) communicates all three stories in his letters. The narrative structure is very clever, because I think the same end would have happened to Walton if Frankenstein hadnt have come along and informed him of the dangers of obsessions, it would have ruined his life, as the creation of the monster ruined Frankensteins. It was obviously morally wrong of Frankenstein to devote his life to his obsession, where his life was perfect before this fixation with natural philosophy. He shunned his friends, and if he had not done this to create the monster, they would not have all been killed. There are many points where the reader does not know whether he was morally wrong or not, and the best example of this is when he decides to make the creature. It would have been morally wrong to unnaturally create life in the 19th century, but there is more leeway today as there are so many different views on genetic engineering. Taken as a whole, I think that Victor Frankenstein was morally reprehensible. Even in the 21st century, where the creation of life is more frequent, I think it was morally wrong to take body parts from dead people. I think he should have realised the terrible consequences of his actions before he went ahead with the creation. He did so much research into natural philosophy and he should have realised from his study that he needed to learn from other peoples experiences. His obsession with being the first got in the way of him thinking straight. I think Frankenstein leaving the monster to fend for himself was also morally wrong. All human beings are cared for once they are born, so leaving the monster alone is suggesting that he isnt human and doesnt deserve to be treated as one. As the creature was often out in the open, this gave him a chance to be shunned and discriminated against by society which introduced the feelings of hatred and aggression which were used later on to destroy Frankensteins happiness. Frankenstein is really responsible, because if he were not so obsessed with natural philosophy and the death of his mother, he would never have developed a passion for saving life and would never have discovered that creating life was possible. He only had himself to blame for the destruction caused by the creature; not only to himself but to those he loved. Frankenstein never really admitted the responsibility, he said that God gave him the power, I found such astonishing power placed upon my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it and though he did take a long time to think about what to do, he reached never realised the full outcome of his decision. Although he realised his mistake at the end, and tried to put someone off making the same one, he never admitted the responsibility out loud. So, in conclusion to the title, Id say that Victor Frankenstein is a very morally reprehensible character. Show preview only The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Mary Shelley section.